![]() ![]() PS: the Priority of User's action over background processes should be the norm everywhere in XnView. If this method is still too slow: take into account the 2 previous suggestions (Priority of User's action + 2 Passes). You should be able to choose the calculation method for both 'Enlarge' and 'Reduce' (+Thumbnails) through drop lists. When moving/scrolling the area or resizing the window, calculate only the new parts. Calculate only the area that is really showed in the window. When using "High Quality Zoom", it takes some time and requires more memory: it looks as if XnView was resizing the whole image in memory first in order to show it! It's fast, but looks terrible for normal use). I noticed that when using normal zoom quality, there is no impact on memory and the image is immediately resized by using 'Nearest Neighbour' (which just increases the size of the pixels. User's actions should start immediately (and interrupt background processes if required). Use 2 passes (Normal quality first, then Higher quality in the background) ![]() I update this thread and make a list of various usefull requests about this 'High Zoom Quality' issue: I do love how polished, professional looking, and bugfree XnView is though. Your current fast zoom is pretty rough, and I have heard this is the reason why some people do not use XnView. ![]() I don't know what methods they use, but maybe you could make two options for high zoom quality- one that does the method you use now, and one that is faster, but better quality than your current low quality fast zoom. Also, Slowview's high quality zoom full screen view is fast, and of good enough quality for me. some of these are faster than others, but even the fast ones are good enough quality for me. Irfanview has about 6 different methods available for resampling an image to full screen size (hermite, triangle, mitchell, bell, b-spline, lanczos). Zoom quality is on program is slower than molasses. Look really bad unless "High zoom quality" is turned on, but if High XnView is a very polished and professional looking program.īut, I have one big complaint with it. So, I'll be moving on to something else.Here is a quote from something I wrote online: It looks like a nice program, but I really don't want to be fighting an interface in a program that you have to pay for. Then I had to drag them again to contract them. As it was, I had to manually drag each to expand them. It would be nice to be able to expand all the tracks vertically with some keyboard modifier + mouse wheel. That backing track didn't come out too well on the recording, so I'm adding it in as an audio track. I'm working on one now where I recorded a music performance live. For instance, suppose I want to match up an audio track with a video track. The use case here is, sometimes I need to see the audio wave. I have grown acustomed to being able to expand or contract all tracks vertically in other software I use. I don't care if you have to use shift, control, shift+control, or whatever to enable horizontal scroll with the mouse wheel, but for goodness sake, something should enable it.Īdditionally, there does not seem to be a way to easily expand each track vertically. I was just checking out the free trial and saw that the timeline could not be horizontally scrolled with the mouse. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |